is life better now than it was in the past

A well planned electrical substation maintenance assures reliable supply and reduction in failures. Many failures can be detected during the electrical substation maintenance routines, reducing the risk of significant plant downtime, and preventing future problems. The risk of a catastrophic failure can cost large time and money. The electrical work you perform could include new work Jimmy McGill (aka Saul Goodman, played by Bob Odenkirk) is a klutz — a ne'er do well. The series focuses on his aspirations of becoming a high-powered lawyer like his older brother, but we spend. Monday's mid-season finale of "Better Call Saul" ended not only on one of the series' most shocking moments, but on a moment that will going to go down as one of the most shocking television scenes While I agree with this idea to a great extent, I also believe that many aspects of the life were better in the past. Without a doubt, life is a lot better now. A good example of this is the greater longevity that humans enjoy today. This means people spend much longer on the planet as compared to their ancestors. Answer (1 of 15): Depends on what you mean by the past. In the late 60s to mid-70s life was better in the following ways: There were only a few TV stations, and they signed off the air from midnight to 6 a.m. Gave one's brain time to rest without the constant gabble of a 24/7 news cycle. There Life today is better than it was 50 years ago. Modern life is very different from life 50 years ago. Some people think the changes were positive changes while some people thinks the changes were negative changes. It is true; life 50 years ago is simpler than life now. 50 years ago‚ the pace of life is slower and family could spend their time together longer. They could attend family occasions like wedding and Eid. membuat sepeda listrik dari dinamo starter motor. Denne artikkelen er over ti år gammel og kan inneholde utdatert informasjon. A reader has asked a simple yet important question was everything better in the past? We’ve passed the question on to a doctor, a historian, a social researcher, a biologist and a philosopher. Better health now Stig Slørdahl is a medical professor and the head of faculty at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology NTNU. He gives an unequivocal no to the question of whether the old days were better. “We don’t need to use much imagination as far as health is concerned. There are countries in the world right now where millions of people experience the old days’ every single day of the year,” says Slørdahl. Physician Stig Slørdahl. Photo NTNU Historian Ola H. Grytten Photo NHH “In the beginning of the 1800s the life expectancy in Norway was 40. That’s the current life expectancy in for instance Botswana.” Slørdahl isn’t nostalgic about times passed, referring to a high infant mortality. Ditto with regard to when currently curable infections were still taking lives. “Think about living without simple preventive measures such as vaccines or when women had to plan their lives without access to birth control. “Of course all eras have had their advantages, but when it comes to health nearly everyone would prefer today’s realities,” he says. Richer than ever Childhood and adolescence researcher Mona-Iren Hauge Photo NKVTS People in the richer countries have better health. But what about our standard of living and our work life? For an answer to that we contacted Ola H. Grytten, a professor in economic history at the Norwegian School of Economics NHH in Bergen. “Materialistically speaking, things were worse before," he says. "In Norway, we have never been richer than today. Since 1900 economic growth BNP per person in Norway has increased 16-fold. Real income has risen nearly tenfold. And working hours have been cut by nearly a third.” With this new prosperity we can spend more on health, leisure and travelling. Grytten says that right after WWII Norwegians spent a third of their income on food. But now the share of our household budgets has dropped to about a tenth. Biologist Dag Olav Hessen. “But the job market has become tougher in the past decades, with demands for more productivity, independence and creativity. Many find this hard to cope with,” he says. “We have also to a larger degree become dependent on two incomes per household to keep up with the increased standards of living we've seen in the past 40 years,” says Grytten. The economy, work life and social life have also become more complicated in many ways. “Whether we are better off on the whole is a completely different matter than our material gains. We're no more satisfied than we were 100 years ago, perhaps less so,” argues the historian. More choices Religious philosopher Marius Timmann Mjaaland. It’s common for older persons to shake their heads over today’s youth, and recall their own childhood days as better – fewer problems, better manners and more conservative dress codes. We ask researcher Mona Iren Hauge if teenagers were better before. As it happens she is in the process of writing up a lecture about young people growing up in a globalised world. Hauge answers both yes and no to the question of whether we’re seeing progress or not. “Lots of people today think that boys are falling behind in school because there’s too much focus on theory. There used to be lots of jobs for boys who didn’t do well in school. In that regard, things were better for some boys – but not all,” she says. “On the other hand there are lots of kids who like learning and enjoy school. We have a completely different focus on education compared to fifty years ago. Education is an opportunity for a good life. In that respect we’ve seen improvements for those who are happy with the type of education schools provide. For most people who grew up before the Second World War, a higher education wasn’t even an option.” Hauge is a researcher at the Norwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies NKVTS at Ullevål University Hospital in Oslo, and recently received her doctorate in psychology on the theme of how children become adolescents. Young people of the past were more involved in physical labour. They contributed to the family’s survival through their work. She says that we’ve gone from being a nation that works with its hands to a nation where youths are becoming better educated and more knowledgeable. "We gauge their aptitude and proficiency with standard national exams and are concerned about whether they are getting a good enough education. Are they on the same level as their peers in Sweden, Italy and Germany? “In the old days adolescents had fewer opportunities. Their lives were mapped out for them and for lots of people this sounds fine. But many other appreciate having the choices we see today. We have so much more educational variation and so many alternative ways of living,” says Hauge. No and yes to the environment Dag Olav Hessen is a professor of biology at the University of Oslo. He thinks the answer depends on what kind of environmental issues we are referring to, and no less importantly, on what time scale. So his anwer is initially no, but there's a yes in there too. “If someone claims the environment has improved this is of course incorrect if we’re comparing it to pre-industrial times," says Hessen. "There was little pollution back then, much fewer people on the planet and plenty of nature. But the complaint could be right if for instance we compare it to the 1970s,” he adds. Pollution troubles and the ozone holes are major environmental problems that have generally taken a turn for the better thanks to cleaning technologies and new products. The same can be said about many of the old’ toxins and pesticides, such as dioxins and DDT, he explains. New ones have turned up, but on the whole this situation is better than it was 30 years ago,” “Improved technology has also made cars less polluting. At the same time the number of cars in he world has multiplied, so the net effect is still an increase in pollution. “Environmental consciousness is also more predominant now. The environment has become a key political issue nationally and internationally, not just an appendix. However, that doesn’t mean the effects have been very impressive,” he says. And now we know that the human ecological footprint is too big. “We know that the rainforests are being cut down, that species are becoming extinct and the CO2 in the atmosphere is mounting and we haven’t been able to do much about it. As regards these enormous environmental problems linked to our behaviour, we can clearly conclude that things were better before,” argues Hessen. Belief in progress So far we’ve received one emphatic no, two nos with reservations and one no/yes. So we pass the baton to a Marius Timmann Mjaaland, who holds a PhD in the philosophy of religion, and let him run the last leg. He thinks quite a few things were better before. “More precisely, I don’t think everything is so much better now, even though many of us are better off materialistically than before, at least here in Norway. “One of the most common things in our society is an extreme trust in the future, an irrepressible expectation of the world becoming better and better with mounting progress,” says Mjaaland, who is works as a researcher at the Faculty of Theology at the University of Oslo. He says there has been no denying that we’ve made certain strides of progress, for example in technological aids, medicines, cancer treatment, economic levels and access to a stream of information. And in many ways these strides have made life simpler, more comfortable and perhaps less painful. “But many mix all these small elements of progress up with a belief that humankind is actually moving forward, evolving toward something better, that we can soon eliminate the pain, the discomfort and the problems that we still struggle with,” says the philosopher. He views this thought as potentially dangerous; it’s one of the great illusions in our society. “The belief in progress has had a strong grip in our culture, particularly during some of the previous century. But just when this belief was at its peak and people started thinking they were superhuman, they revealed themselves from their darkest side, as demonstrated by experiences from the WWII and the great empires. “If everything wasn’t better before, I maintain that some things were. If for nothing else, to puncture some of the naive faith in the future which most of all resembles a secular apocalypse, and which is much more dangerous than the religious kind,” concludes Mjaaland. - So now the question is was life better before? Or not? The answer is probably yes in some areas, no in others. This is a typical answer you would get from researchers. It's not easy, but it could perhaps make us a tiny bit wiser. Translated by Glenn Ostling Life now is better than it was 100 years ago. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or is a band IELTS essay on this topic submitted by one of our students. Send us your writing samples for a free band score estimate or get a detailed analysis of your writing for a IELTS essay sampleCompared to life as it was 100 years ago, some people argue that it has greatly improved at present. While I agree with this idea to a great extent, I also believe that many aspects of the life were better in the a doubt, life is a lot better now. A good example of this is the greater longevity that humans enjoy today. This means people spend much longer on the planet as compared to their ancestors. Much of the global population has access to improved health care systems and education. People are much more informed about the importance of sanitation and this also adds years to their quality of life has also improved over the decades. There have been no major wars in the last 50 years. People spend more time with family now than before. There are new methods of entertainment. As the world has seen the shift from the industrial revolution to service industries, more people are now free during the weekends, when they can enjoy these new modes of entertainment. With globalization, almost every corner of the planet has become accessible and each year has seen an increase in the number of tourists around the world. Globalization has also enabled people to access technologies from around the world. These technologies can be used for entertainment, productivity or relaxation. Because of the aforementioned facts, we can definitely say that the life has changed in last 100 years for the betterment of the there is a downside to this progress. The quality of water and air has decreased over the years because of pollution. Many species of birds and animals have disappeared from the planet due to human conclude, life has improved greatly as human race has made significant progress in most aspects of the life in the last 100 years. However, the same advancements have also adversely affected our life and planet in the form of pollution, contamination, and global warming. People need to ensure that new technologies benefit the planet as well, so that we will have an even better world after 100 you have an essay on this topic? Submit it below in the comments for a free band score LinksIELTS Practice TestsBand 9 Essay SamplesBand 9 Letter SamplesBand 8 Letter Samples People eat at a noodle stall at the Han Market in the central Vietnamese city of Danang in November. Vietnamese respondents to the Pew Research Center survey overwhelmingly said life is better than it was 50 years ago. Ye Aung Thu/AFP/Getty Images hide caption toggle caption Ye Aung Thu/AFP/Getty Images People eat at a noodle stall at the Han Market in the central Vietnamese city of Danang in November. Vietnamese respondents to the Pew Research Center survey overwhelmingly said life is better than it was 50 years ago. Ye Aung Thu/AFP/Getty Images The way people perceive their country's economic conditions plays a big role in whether they view their lives more positively now compared with the past, according to a study released Tuesday by the Pew Research Center. Of the nearly 43,000 people surveyed in 38 countries in Asia, Europe, the Middle East, Africa and North and South America, Vietnam had the most positive self-assessment Eighty-eight percent of respondents said life is better today in their country than it was a half-century ago. Other Asian countries round out the top five, including India 69 percent, South Korea 68 percent and Japan 65 percent. At the opposite end of the survey, with the least positive assessment of their lives today, 72 percent of respondents in Venezuela said they are worse off. Bleak assessments were also reported by Mexico 68 percent and Argentina 51 percent. "Latin Americans stand out for their widespread negative assessment of progress over the past half-century," the report says. The findings reported in "Worldwide, People Divided on Whether Life Today Is Better Than in the Past" are part of Pew's annual global attitudes survey. But this is the first time the organization has asked whether life in a person's country is generally better, worse or the same as it was five decades ago, says senior researcher Jacob Poushter. "We're interested in how people see sort of the changing nature of the world and how that affects their lives," he says. Thirty-eight countries were included in the Pew Research Center survey. Pew Research Center hide caption toggle caption Pew Research Center Thirty-eight countries were included in the Pew Research Center survey. Pew Research Center While the results are subjective and depend on the historical events and politics of each country, Poushter says the biggest takeaway from this survey is that economic outlook is an important factor. "Exceptions aside about where actual countries were 50 years ago and what the history has been, it generally finds that economic satisfaction ... tends to be one of the strongest in terms of pushing people to say life is better or worse," says Poushter. For example, in Vietnam, 91 percent of respondents said economic conditions are good. According to the World Bank, Vietnam has become among the world's fastest-growing economies and is projected to continue that upward swing. In Venezuela, with the highest percentage of people saying life is worse, only 20 percent of respondents said the economy was good. A collapse of international oil prices has greatly affected Venezuela's economy, which is almost solely reliant on fossil fuels. Things have become so dire that the Venezuelan government announced this month it would create a cryptocurrency to combat high inflation and replace its virtually worthless currency, the bolivar. While the correlation between economic outlook and positive responses about life today was strong for most countries surveyed, it was not true in all cases — including the United States. "There are countries which, if you look at objectively, are doing well economically but [respondents] still said that life was worse today than it was 50 years ago," says Poushter. "Oftentimes, you see ... more issues with politics, issues with relatively more recent history, in terms of people more upset about where they are compared to 50 years ago." Among respondents, 37 percent said their lives are better and 41 percent said they are worse. Anti-government looters attacked a supermarket in Venezuela's Carabobo state in May. Seventy-two percent of Venezuelans told the Pew Research Center they were worse off than 50 years ago. Ronaldo Schemidt/AFP/Getty Images hide caption toggle caption Ronaldo Schemidt/AFP/Getty Images Anti-government looters attacked a supermarket in Venezuela's Carabobo state in May. Seventy-two percent of Venezuelans told the Pew Research Center they were worse off than 50 years ago. Ronaldo Schemidt/AFP/Getty Images A lot of that comes down to political divisions, says Poushter. "It's just that in the last year, Republicans have become more likely to say life is better off, and Democrats have become less likely to say their lives are better off," he says. Political divides also were apparent in Europe, where those supporting populist parties such as the Alternative for Germany or France's National Front were more likely to say "life is worse off for people like them," the report says. The report finds education level is also a factor affecting whether people see their lives as better now than five decades ago. In more than half the countries polled, respondents with a higher level of education said that for people like themselves, life was better. The greatest educational divide can be seen in Poland, where 76 percent of more educated people said life was better than in the past. Fifty-seven percent of the less educated felt that way. The only two countries where the less educated saw their lives as better today were Nigeria and Turkey. Further, in some countries surveyed, the perceived gains and losses by certain religious and ethnic groups over the last 50 years played a factor in respondents' answers. For example, the survey found that black respondents in South Africa are "much more likely" to say life is better 52 percent than it was 50 years ago, when the country was living under an apartheid system. Just 27 percent of white South Africans said the same. If you were able to accurately evaluate life today against life one hundred years ago, one thousand years ago, or even 10 thousand years ago, would we be able to determine which is better? Humans have a tendency to overvalue what they know. We find it easy to believe that our country is the best. Or that our mother’s cooking can’t be beat. The neighborhood we grew up in was better than any other. Similarly, we may believe that life today is better than the way people lived in centuries past. But is that actually true? It is certainly true that our mastery of travel makes just about every corner of the globe is accessible. I can pack a bag, catch a flight, and be halfway around the world within 24 hours. Assuming, of course, no travel restrictions. A trip to an average grocery store yields a remarkable variety of produce, and an almost dizzying array of processed food. The internet makes access to information nearly ubiquitous, and allows us to communicate with people without thought to geographical limitations. Lifespans are longer, literacy rates are higher, some previously deadly diseases have been all but eliminated. However, each of these things have downsides. Easy travel is at the expense of burning fossil fuels, which is contributing to climate change. The same can be said about produce that travels thousands of miles to those well-stocked grocery stores. And all that processed food has brought about a crisis in obesity. While communication is easier with the internet, social media apps are making us more polarized and as such we hear each other less. What good is a longer lifespan if we use those extra hours sitting in traffic jams and overall leading more stressed lifestyles? Are the negatives worth the positives? Is life today better than in the past? Related questions How have we changed? Past, present, or future? Is it fair to judge the past with morals of today? Are we too busy? Post navigation

is life better now than it was in the past